A.
If the over-expansion that violates R105 or R107 is due to visible damage and not used for
strategic benefit, no penalty is imposed.
B.
If an expansion that contributes to a violation of R106 is due to visible damage the team may extend a
different component in a different direction, and no penalty is imposed.
C.
If the over-expansion is MOMENTARY and is not used for strategic benefit,
no penalty is imposed.
The intent of the G413-A and G413-B exceptions to this rule are to prevent
piling on a punitive response to a ROBOT that’s already experienced hardship
and not leveraging that hardship for gain.
Exceptions are only given for visible damage, as perceived
by a REFEREE. Teams should not assume that REFEREES will give an exception for
unobservable damage even if ROBOT function is affected.
Teams exploiting the exception to part B by designing in
something to “break” will not be given an exception and will likely also be
given a violation of G211.
Examples related to exceptions A and B include the
following:
A. a physical device on a team’s ROBOT, whose purpose is to
restrain their TOWER mechanism from extending beyond the 30in (76.2cm) height limit
imposed by R107, breaks after a
collision with another ROBOT. Provided the ROBOT does not use the now-too-long
extension to climb the TOWER, no violation is assigned.
B. a vertical structural member of a ROBOT breaks at the
bottom and rotates out such that it exceeds the 12in (30.48cm) limit imposed by
R105. The
ROBOT then parks such that its extension blocks opponent ROBOTS from reaching the
OUTPOST. A MAJOR FOUL is issued.
C. a part of a ROBOT is damaged causing a panel to extend out
less than 12in (30.48cm) on one side of the ROBOT. The ROBOT then extends out
in another direction to intake FUEL. As visible damage has caused an expansion
that contributes to the violation of R106, no penalty is
imposed.
D. a mechanism that controls a ROBOT’S intake is damaged in a
way that’s not visible to a REFEREE and the team can no longer bring their
intake back in. The team then extends out in another direction to climb the
TOWER. The intake is not visibly damaged, so a violation of a MAJOR FOUL is
issued.
The intent of the G413-C extension is to prevent violations for
inadvertent mechanism flexing and movement for short periods of time during the
MATCH not to provide a pathway to intentionally design less-than-MOMENTARY
over-extensions.
Examples related to exception C include the
following:
E. A ROBOT has a mechanism deployed out over one side of the
ROBOT PERIMETER which, due to ROBOT movement or a collision, flexes MOMENTARILY
beyond the projection of that side of the ROBOT PERIMETER. As the action is
less than MOMENTARY and not used for strategic benefit, no penalty is imposed.
F. A ROBOT has a mechanism designed to rotate from side A to
side B of their ROBOT and MOMENTARILY extends out both side A and B during
rotation. This action is used for strategic benefit so a violation of a MAJOR
FOUL is issued.
For example F, the ROBOT will likely need to take
corrective action before being allowed to compete in subsequent MATCHES.
Note that G211 may apply if a team
is intentionally exceeding the expansion limits for strategic benefit.
At the conclusion of the MATCH, the Head REFEREE may elect
to visually inspect a ROBOT and remove the violation if the damage is verified.